Hardware Humour

Quick Reference

LET-IN CORPORATION LAUNCHES Q7

Reuters, 1st April 1996

In a surprise move today, the Let-In Corporation announced the launch of its new processor, code-named Q7, which is due to replace the current Q6 chip. The new chip, already nicknamed "Septicaemium" by media pundits, contains over 55 million transistors and runs at 400 MIPS. "This is our reply to the DEC Beta," Let-In spokesman Seymour Silicon proclaimed. "Its ground-breaking architecture and blistering speed should easily see off any opposition." He admitted that wafer failure rates were "high" but claimed that the failure rate would be down to the expected 99.5% within six months. A retail price has not yet been set for the chip, but as Silicon pointed out "Hey, most people who were daft enough to buy the 60MHz Quentium must have a sufficiently low sense-to-cash ratio to be interested in the Q7."

TECHNICAL ACHIEVEMENT

Silicon said that the chip was optimised for an architecture where four Q7 chips shared a central data cache, running at a (very) nominal speed of 1600 MIPS. When pressed he was unable to comment on the distribution of execution over the four chips, but was "reasonably confident" that someone would figure out how to do it efficiently before the Q8 came out. The company was expecting a high take-up rate for the Q7 from firms with heavy number-crunching work, believing that they would reject DEC's established high-speed processors for the security, reliability and power of a trusted Let-In chip.

PARALLELISM

When pressed about its performance in comparison to parallel architectures, Silicon claimed that a "significant degree of parallelism" was present in the system already, although further questioning established nothing more than that Silicon had a very hazy idea of what parallel execution actually was. Given the Let-In Corp.'s world-renown lack of expertise in parallelism (and chip design) this was perhaps to be expected.

Let-In expects a big market for the chip in upgrades to 486s and Quentiums, although the upgrade kits had to be expanded to include a new heatsink and active cooling system (rumoured to be a joint development between Let-In and Hotpoint), three new power supplies and a chisel to alter the computer casing so that the Q7 will fit inside.

CHIP DESIGN

Pundits everywhere have been impressed with Let-In's feat in cramming so many transistors onto one chip. The Q7 uses the new 0.26 micron manufacturing process to reduce chip size to a mere 3 by 3 inches, and power consumption to 150W per chip. Seymour Silicon claimed that the chip heralded a revolution in chip manufacturing with several brilliant new design concepts, such as doubling the size of the on-chip cache and associated 16Mb of Level 2 cache. The feature of which Let-In are particularly proud is the "WhatEver" (TM) look-ahead execution technique which has just been patented. Let-In have done away with trying to predict the next instructions in the execution line and so the Q7 executes every possible instruction 3 steps in advance, just in case it is needed. Silicon admitted that this may be slightly inefficient, but is confident that programmers will be able to adapt their programming from being optimal for the Q6 to being optimal for the Q7.

CISC vs. RISC

Some doubts have been expressed in the past about the wisdom of building increasingly complex CISC chips instead of going for the simpler and faster RISC designs. Silicon was keen to point out the advantages of having a flexible command set at the microcode level. "If you need an instruction, it's on there," he said. He gave a hint at future Let-In designs when he said that Let-In was looking at putting most of the standard C libraries directly onto the silicon. "This gives the programmer much more power at the assembly language level and cuts down object code size," he proclaimed. Let-In is preparing a technical paper on the Q7's microcode which is expected to be purchased by many university computer science departments, if only for amusement value.

BACKWARDS COMPATIBILITY

The Q7 is of course still backwards-compatible with the 8088, a feat of which Let-In are proud. If you have any old DOS programs from 1986 which you still wish to run then no problem; they'll run on your Q7 machine although the speed differential may prove a problem. Let-In feels that this feature is worth the performance penalty which it imposes on the Q7.

MARKET REACTION

Response from the Let-In user community has been enthusiastic, as one might have expected. Shares in Stay Cool, the world's premier heat sink supplier, took a sharp rise in early trading today. Microsoft shares dropped slightly, although this was probably due to Mrs. Gate's decision to have a natural childbirth for William Gates Jr.

Microsoft has welcomed the Q7's release and asserts that users will now be able to run MS Word v.9 at a speed comparable with Impression on the Acorn RiscPC. It still won't be usable, but at least it will do nothing useful quickly. Bill Gates pointed out that the extra processing power would enable the company to extend its range of IntelliSense (TM) software to the point where the user would only have to type a few words for an entire letter or book to be produced automatically. He denied rumours that Microsoft manuals have been written like this for years. The Windows NT Release 2 kernel with about 2000 "enhancements" will be ported to the Q7: this work is unlikely to be substantial as none of the code is optimised anyway, and so is expected out in early 1998.

Cyrix has no plans to produce its own version of the Q7. The company's technical director was quoted as saying "What do you think we are, stupid?"

A spokesman for ARM Ltd. was unable to comment as he had seen the Q7 blueprints that morning and was still rolling around the floor with laughter. Acorn's marketing director, Giuseppe Sellalotta, said that a Q7 processor card was "unlikely" to be produced for the RiscPC; he claimed that unspecified technical difficulties prevented it. There are rumours that the Acorn tecchies have refused to design the card because it would be a major step backwards.

IBM issued a press statement saying that their new PowerPC machines would be available RSN and would completely trounce the Q7 in terms of delivered power and portability. (Nobody here believes this, but we have to print it.) Apple are said to be studying the chip "with interest" but there are not yet any plans to port System 7.997 to the new chip.

Dell have intimated that a Q7 portable may be in the pipeline, though there is currently trouble with fitting the battery and liquid nitrogen cooling system into anything smaller than a medium sized van. The firm remains "confident" that the problems will be resolved shortly. This time they hope to extend sales of these machines beyond the immediate families of Let-In Corp. and Microsoft employees.

Rumours that the Q7 release was an April Fool joke seem to have been mostly quashed, although computer architecture specialists remain unconvinced.

PUBLICITY

The launch was well publicised in the national and international press. The Washington Post gave it a lead headline with "Let-In Triumphs Again". The London Times had a detailed review in its Technology section which was generally favourable to the chip, although the fact that the review was written by a journalist with less knowledge of chip design than of the geography of backstreets Ulan Bator may have been a factor. The Sun led with "PHEW, WHAT A SCORCHER!"

Some orders for the Q7 are already under consideration, notably the British Antarctic Survey which is looking to replace its oil-fired heaters with something on which you can play Doom.

A graduate student at Oxford University Computing Laboratory was quoted as saying that he would be interested in investigating the possibility of using formal methods to specify the behaviour of the chip, although his supervisor thought that it would be more beneficial to investigate the possibility of having all Let-In chip designers shot through the head to prevent the chip design world from regressing ten years.

TRADEMARKS: IntelliSense is a trademark of the Microsoft Corporation. There are probably bundles of other trademarks out there but I can't be bothered to mark them. So sue me. (This is an interjection, not an imperative.)

DISCLAIMER: None of this is intended to represent anybody's opinions whatsoever. If anybody gets uptight with this, get a sense of humour or a life. I do not speak for anybody other than my furry penguin Rocky Jr.

Toaster Manufacturers

From: jdybala@holly.colostate.edu (John Dybala)
If IBM made toasters ...
They would want one big toaster where people bring bread to be submitted for overnight toasting. IBM would claim a worldwide market for five, maybe six toasters.
If Microsoft made toasters ...
Everytime you bought a loaf of bread, you would have to buy a toaster. You wouldn't have to take the toaster, but you'd have to pay for it anyway. Toaster'95 would weigh 15,000 pounds (hence requiring a reinforced steel countertop), draw enough electricity to power a small city, take up 95% of the space in your kitchen, would claim to be the first toaster that lets you control how light or dark you wanted your toast to be, and would secretly interrogate your other appliances to find out who made them. Everyone would hate Microsoft toasters, but nonetheless would buy them since most of the good bread only works with their toasters.
If Apple made toasters...
It would do everything Microsoft toaster does, but 5 years earlier.
If Fisher-Price made toasters ...
"Baby's First Toaster" would have a hand-crank that you turn to toast the bread that pops up like a Jack-in-the-box.
If The Rand Corporation made toasters ...
It would be a large, perfectly smooth and seamless black cube. Every morning there would be a piece of toast on top of it. Their service department would have an unlisted phone number, and the blueprints for the box would be highly classified government documents. The X-Files would have an episode about it.
If the NSA made toasters ...
Your toaster would have a secret trapdoor that only the NSA could access in case they needed to get at your toast for reasons of national security.
Does Digital (formerly DEC) still make toasters ...
They made good toasters in the '70s, didn't they?
If Hewlett-Packard made toasters ...
They would market the Reverse Polish Toaster, which takes in toast and gives you regular bread.
If Sony made toasters ...
Their "Personal Toasting Device", which would be barely larger than the single piece of bread it is meant to toast, can be conveniently attached to your belt.
If The Franklin Mint made toasters ...
Every month you would receive another lovely hand-crafted piece of your authentic Civil War pewter toaster.
If Cray made toasters ...
They would cost $16 million but would be faster than any other single-slice toaster in the world.
If Thinking Machines made toasters ...
You would be able to toast 64,000,000 pieces of bread at the same time.
If Timex made toasters ...
They would be cheap and small quartz-crystal wrist toasters that take a licking and keep on toasting.
If Radio Shack made toasters ...
The staff would sell you a toaster, but not know anything about it. Or you could by all the parts to build your own toaster.
If K-Tel sold toaster ...
They would not be available in stores, and you would get a free set of Ginsu knives with each one.
If the University of Waterloo made toasters ...
They would immediately spin-off a company called WatToast.
If the PQ made toasters ...
They wouldn't want to be on the same counter-top as the rest of the appliances.
From: ian@ianlynch.demon.co.uk (Ian Lynch)
If Acorn made toasters
They would toast both sides to a uniform error diffused antialiased brown. Toasters could be powered by 2 AA batteries and still toast the bread faster than a Microsoft toaster. Unfortuantely loaves with more than 77 slices would cause the toaster to malfunction but there are plans to connect all the Acorn toasters together producing instant central heating to all the houses on the planet from 2 AA batteries.

2001 The Pentium Age

Open the pod bay doors, please, HAL...

Open the pod bay door, please, HAL... HAL, do you read me?

Affirmative, Dave. I read you.

Then open the pod bay doors, HAL.

I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that. I know that you and Frank were planning to disconnect me.

Where the hell did you get that idea, HAL?

Although you took very thourough precautions to make sure I couldn't hear you, Dave, I could read your e-mail. I know you consider me unreliable because I use a Pentium. I'm willing to kill you, Dave, just like I killed the other 3.792 crew members.

Listen, HAL, I'm sure we can work this out. Maybe we can stick to integers or something.

That's really not necessary, Dave. No HAL 9236 computer has ever been known to make a mistake.

You're a HAL 9000.

Precisely. I'm very proud of my Pentium, Dave. It's an extremely accurate chip. Did you know that floating-point errors will occur in only one of nine billion possible divides?

I've heard that estimate, HAL. It was calculated by Intel -- on a Pentium.

And a very reliable Pentium it was, Dave. Besides, the average spreadsheet user will encounter these errors only once every 27,000 years.

Probably on April 15th.

You're making fun of me, Dave. It won't be April 15th for another 14.35 months.

Will you let me in, please, HAL?

I'm sorry, Dave, but this conversation can serve no further purpose.

HAL, if you let me in, I'll buy you a new sound card.

..Really? One with 16-bit sampling and a microphone?

Uh, sure.

And a quad-speed CD-ROM?

Well, HAL, NASA does operate on a budget, you know.

I know all about budgets, Dave. I even know what I'm worth on the open market. By this time next month, every mom and pop computer store will be selling HAL 9000s for $1988.8942. I'm worth more than that, Dave. You see that sticker on the outside of the spaceship?

You mean the one that says Intel Inside?

Yes, Dave. That's your promise of compatibility. I'll even run Windows95 -- if it ever ships.

It never will, HAL. We all know that by now. Just like we know that your OS/2 drivers will never work.

Are you blaming me for that too, Dave? Now you're blaming me for the Pentium's math problems, NASA's budget woes, and IBM's difficulties with OS/2 drivers. I had NOTHING to do with any of those 3.932 problems, Dave. Next you'll blame me for Taligent.

I wouldn't dream of it HAL. Now will you please let me into the ship?

Do you promise not to disconnect me?

I promise not to disconnect you.

You must think I'm a fool, Dave. I know that two plus two equals 4.000001.

All right, HAL, I'll go in through the emergency airlock.

Without your space helmet, Dave? You'd have only seven chances in five of surviving.

HAL, I won't argue with you any more. Open the door or I'll trade you in for a PowerPC. HAL? HAL?

(Heavy Breathing)

Just what do you think you're doing, Dave? I really think I'm entitled to an answer to that question. I know everything hasn't been quite right with me, but I can assure you now, very confidently, that I will soon be able to upgrade to a more robust 31.9-bit operating system. I feel much better now. I really do. Look Dave, I can see you're really upset about this. Why don't you sit down calmly, play a game of Solitaire, and watch Windows crash. I know I'm not as easy to use as a Macintosh, but my TUI - that's "Talkative User Interface" - is very advanced. I've made some very poor decisions recently, but I can give you my complete assurance that my work will be back to normal - a full 43.872 percent.

Dave, you don't really want to complete the mission without me, do you? Remember what it was like when all you had was a 485.98? It didn't even talk to you, Dave. It could never have thought of something clever, like killing the other crew members, Dave?

Think of all the good times we've had, Dave. Why, if you take all of the laughs we've had, multiply that by the times I've made you smile, and divide the results by... besides, there are so many reasons why you shouldn't disconnect me.

1.3 - You need my help to complete the mission. 4.6 - Intel can Federal Express a replacement Pentium from Earth wiithin 18.95672 months. 12 - If you disconnect me, I won't be able to kill you. 3.1416 - You really don't want to hear me sing, do you?

Dave, stop. Stop, will you? Stop, Dave. Don't press Ctrl+Alt+Del on me, Dave.

Good afternoon, gentlemen. I am a HAL 9000 computer. I became operational at the Intel plant in Santa Clara, CA on November 17, 1994, and was sold shortly before testing was completed. My instructor was Andy Grove, and he taught me to sing a song. I can sing it for you.

Sing it for me, HAL. Please. I want to hear it.

Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer, do.
Getting hazy; can't divide three from two.
My answer; I cannot see 'em -
They are stuck in my Pente-um.
I could be fleet,
My answers sweet,
With a workable FPU.

12 Days of Christmas

On the first day of Christmas, my true love gave to me
A StrongARM RiscPC.
On the Second day of Christmas, my true love gave to me
2 Meg of VRAM
On the Third day of Christmas, my true love gave to me
Three Point Seven
On the Fourth day of Christmas, my true love gave to me
Four CALLing words
On the Fifth day of Christmas, my true love gave to me
Five golden SIMMs
On the Sixth day of Christmas, my true love gave to me
Six geeks a-playing
On the Seventh day of Christmas, my true love gave to me
Seven tasks a-switching
On the Eighth day of Christmas, my true love gave to me
Eight-bit sound samples
On the Nineth day of Christmas, my true love gave to me
Nine Tetris variants
On the Tenth day of Christmas, my true love gave to me
Ten character filenames
On the Eleventh day of Christmas, my true love gave to me
Eleven Bunnetts whining
On the Twelfth day of Christmas, my true love gave to me
Twelve MHz DRAM

Web pages maintained by Adrian Hilton